Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
![]() | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Repeated vandalism, mostly IP but sometimes by newly registered users. Minimal constructive edits from IP users. It's also an ongoing controversial, contentious topic, which puts the article at a more strict encyclopedic standard. In addition, the topic is high-profile with various political views involved in the current events, which could potentially conflicting with the neutrality of the article, if anyone can edit it. Requesting indefinite semi-protection. Pradedovići (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- Could you clarify what you mean by this? Pradedovići (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Pradedovići: Eastern Europe and the Balkans are considered a contentious topic, where administrators can impose special rules and restrictions on both editors and pages. IanDBeacon, I think that administrators can recognise which areas are contentious topics and shouldn't feel obliged to use the procedure when normal protections would work. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- I am pretty free with adding protection but I don't feel comfortable using WP:ECP without a reason other than it can be used. I see only two recent reverts and they were fairly innocent edits to add an external link to a political group, presumably involved in the protests. Johnuniq (talk) 04:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- @Pradedovići: Eastern Europe and the Balkans are considered a contentious topic, where administrators can impose special rules and restrictions on both editors and pages. IanDBeacon, I think that administrators can recognise which areas are contentious topics and shouldn't feel obliged to use the procedure when normal protections would work. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:37, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
- Could you clarify what you mean by this? Pradedovići (talk) 20:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 22:36, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: People keep putting the title "New York City" as a title of a film in the fall of 2026. This is clearly fake. Georgia guy (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:22, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
User(s) partially blocked: 2600:1700:28F8:550:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) (from Wisin). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed within a month of the previous protection expiring and has been ramping up recently. Skywatcher68 (talk) 00:16, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. Longhornsg (talk) 00:58, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 01:32, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ongoing IP vandalism/false information (esp. player names) (likely IP sock). Wikipedialuva (talk) 05:04, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Constant addition of poorly sourced, promotional WP:SPAM and WP:PUFFERY by a /64 IP address. They have been trying to change the page into an WP:ADMASQ and have not listened to or responded to any warnings. cyberdog958Talk 05:32, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Since at least 2023 IPs have been adding the same content dozens of times about a YouTuber with links to their YouTube channel and Twitter. [1] Also frequent problems with adding of unsorced or poorly sourced content Moribundum (talk) 07:42, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Relevant to WP:ARBPIA. Thanks in advance!. Smallangryplanet (talk) 09:47, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Massive edit warring has presumed just a month after the last full lock. I request another full lock for a period of around four weeks, and to revert to the status quo ante version [2]. Thanks. Austronesier (talk) 10:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Full protection: Edit-warring / content dispute. Left guide (talk) 10:53, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Problematic IP-edits since March 5. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:59, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keep removing talk page sections. Vestrian24Bio 13:07, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:12, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 13:14, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP addresses persistently using talk page as forum since 2020. dotXK 13:17, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs keep changing the player's nationality in the short description, this has been going on for a long time. Annh07 (talk) 13:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Least Action (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by at least two IPs who keeps inserting an Indian name for a Southeast Asian tournament. Probably the same user using a roaming IP service provider. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection:
Reason: putting unsourced non-notable entries to the list for PR purposes. Other articles include Installation (computer programs), Nullsoft, Windows Installer 141.136.76.43 (talk) 15:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: BLP violations and edit warring. Borgenland (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent disruptive edit by IP users, reverting tables as its own delight. >Being several different IP there is no chance to talk. Riktetta (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dieter Lloyd Wexler 16:03, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Skitash (talk) 16:40, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-Protection: High level of repeated, argumentative IP edits that needed reverting for WP:BLP and WP:LEDE vios. See WP:BLPN for alert. JFHJr (㊟) 17:08, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent block evasion/sockpuppetry. Waxworker (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP and new user changes/blanking revolving around the same content frequently even after multiple reverts. Persists to be the same the every other day. Hence, I request for extended confirmed user protection. 456legendtalk 17:18, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent non-neutral vandalism. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 17:38, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of vandalism from IP users, removing any mentions of (alleged) usage of LRAD during protest in Serbia. No.cilepogača (talk) 18:03, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bolsonarism (2nd nomination) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA BuickCenturyDriver. Codename AD talk 18:20, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:23, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA. Codename AD talk 18:35, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 18:48, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated, ongoing addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 18:57, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of WP:SPA edit-warring and vandalism. One user was blocked only for disruptive behavior to resurface. GuardianH 19:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Temporary semi-protection is needed because of persistent unconstructive editing by IP user(s) in last month, especially past 4 days. -Avantiputra7 (talk) 20:04, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Hello, I was wondering if you could help with the creation of this page for Danny Lauter. He is currently the starting quarterback for Georgetown University and holds the schools single game passing yard record. He is also generating NFL Interest. He was invited down to the Super bowl in New Orleans to meet with a lot of executives and to go to a lot of the high profile events. He also had dinner with Tom Brady and a lot of other top figures in the NFL. They were giving him a lot of good advice on how to secure his name and they mentioned that Wikipedia was a great platform. I have read the prior reasons for deletion and I understand why, nut now I am asking for some help to create a new page for him now that he has gained a lot of notoriety. 141.161.163.60 (talk) 17:37, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
- Without any sort of sources to back up all of these assertions your argument is doomed to fail. (Also, anyone who suggests Wikipedia as a place to get one's name out there clearly has no understanding of Wikipedia and should likely be dismissed for incompetence.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:48, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.